This morning's One Jerusalem conference call was with Ambassador Dore Gold, former Sharon advisor and the current President of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He's been at the forefront - along with Natan Sharansky and his folks at One Jerusalem - in trying to keep Jerusalem unified. His most specific book on the subject is The Fight for Jerusalem. Also on the call were: Jerry Gordon (IsraPundit), David Gerstman Soccer Dad), David Bogner (Treppenwitz), Rick Richman (Jewish Current Issues), and Anne Lieberman (Boker Tov, Boulder). OJ's Allen Roth was moderating the call and as always the audio should be up on the One Jerusalem frontpage within a few hours.
Ambassador Gold's message: "Only a free and democratic Israel will protect Jerusalem for all faiths". This is so demonstrably obvious that, honestly, we can't understand how it's even a debate. When Israel's Arab enemies took East Jerusalem in 1949, they quite literally ethnically cleansed the Old City of Jews. For decades, they denied all Jews all access to all Jewish holy sites - and while people watched from across the border, they very publicly desecrated Jewish cemeteries and relics. This was not an aberration: it was anti-Semitic venting that would be repeated every time Israel's Arab enemies took over Jewish holy sites from Israel. More recently Palestinians murdered Israelis in the process of taking over Joseph's Tomb, desecrating it, and painting it green to mark it as an exclusively Islamic holy site. The desecration of Jewish artifacts in Hebron, following what happened to Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus, is ongoing. And of course, the Rosetta Stone to how limited Palestinian sovereignty over holy places becomes diplomatically and internationally protected all-out destruction of Jewish holy sites, the Wakf's destruction of the Temple Mount
According to the ambassador, "the Israeli government got itself into this process through the back door" after Israel's foreign policy establishment tried to work out basic principles for a future deal. Then the classic anti-Israel diplomatic bait and switch kicked in: Israeli officials suggested a willingness to discuss limited concessions in the context of a shelf deal to be implemented later, and suddenly there were full blown peace talks. No matter how provisional they are, conditional suggestions somehow consistently end up as anti-Israel starting points. Under the Road Map Israel said "we'll embrace a Palestinian state as long as the Palestinians meet their obligations." The Palestinians - following Hezbollah's example in the context of Israel's UN-certified withdrawal from Lebanon - merely refused to meet their obligations while fantastically insisting that Israel hadn't made the necessary security and territorial concessions.
Worse, just hearing out positions lay the groundwork for future State Department and international pressure: "but you already agreed to this" -- "but you promised that was just in theory" -- "well we're past that now". And so the new round of negotiations is being done on the basis of the preliminary Clinton negotiating positions - the ones that Barak agreed to hear out as the maximum Palestinian demands that they would presumably negotiate on. Israel had been promised again and again that they should listen to all options - at least the beginning of negotiations - because they wouldn't be punished for merely hearing out the maximum Palestinian positions. Screwed again.
After the jump, how diplomatic pressure, Palestinian intransigence, and breathtakingly unreliable international assurances may end up with Jews and Christians being denied access to their holy places in Jerusalem - to say nothing of the slow military and cultural suffocation of all of Israel.