« January 2005 | Main | March 2005 »

Can We Bomb Them Anyway?

So Syria is desperately trying to suck up:

Iraqi officials said Sunday that Syrian authorities had captured Saddam Hussein's half-brother and 29 other officials of the deposed dictator's Baath Party in Syria and handed them over to Iraq in an apparent goodwill gesture.

And all this because Israel threatened to bomb them yesterday. If that's all it's gonna take, Israel should lob a missile or two and see if Assad hands over the missing WMDs.

Wrap Your Head Around This

Progress toward peace is about to fall apart because Abbas has yet to confront militant Palestinian organizations. Sharon has called upon the new Palestinian government to take immediate action. Result? Scale back even the small steps that Abbas has taken (as if "please stop killing Jews" is a step, but hey, so it goes in the Middle East):

Abbas... has pursued dialogue with militants, arguing that confronting them would cause civil strife. But Palestinian officials said talks planned with militant groups in Cairo to discuss a cease-fire with Israel were postponed for 10 days until March 15 due to the Tel Aviv attack.

In 1948, Ben Gurion ordered the army to fire on the ship Altalena, which was being sailed by Begin's Jewish Irgun militia. Jewish soldiers killed and were killed by other Jewish soldiers - all of them desperately needed during the War of Independence - because the decision had been made that Israel would be defended by a single army under a single government. Today, Abbas won't go as far as to speak harshly to Hamas, an organization ostensibly acting at cross purposes to the Palestinian Authority, because it might "cause civil strife." For 500 years, a government's ability to maintain a monopoly on violence has been the central feature of the nation-state. So either the Palestinians are planning their own new, special kind of state, or they're not going to have radically change how they approach the terrorists in their midst.

Might As Well Start the Debate Now

Before Qaddafi gave up his WMDs, he announced to Berlusconi that he was doing it because of Bush's invasion of Iraq. Literally announced it! That didn't stop the Left from pretending that Bush had nothing to do with it. So now that Syria is next up on the list of Arab dominos to fall because of Bush's cowboy antics, the Left is already working to deny Bush the credit. Mostly because the White House isn't doing enough to publicize this kind of stuff:

The leader of this Lebanese intifada [for independence from Syria] is Walid Jumblatt, the patriarch of the Druze Muslim community and, until recently, a man who accommodated Syria's occupation. But something snapped for Jumblatt last year, when the Syrians overruled the Lebanese constitution and forced the reelection of their front man in Lebanon, President Emile Lahoud. The old slogans about Arab nationalism turned to ashes in Jumblatt's mouth, and he and Hariri openly began to defy Damascus...
"It's strange for me to say it, but this process of change has started because of the American invasion of Iraq," explains Jumblatt. "I was cynical about Iraq. But when I saw the Iraqi people voting three weeks ago, 8 million of them, it was the start of a new Arab world." Jumblatt says this spark of democratic revolt is spreading. "The Syrian people, the Egyptian people, all say that something is changing. The Berlin Wall has fallen. We can see it."

On the other hand, the little 4 year old who wants to thank the Pope for his wrongheaded opposition to the liberation of Iraq - that's at 3000+ hits on newsmap.

Liars

The Reuters headline - all over Google News - is "Israel steps up military operations". Kind of makes it look like Sharon is about to undermine the peace process by reigniting military operations. The actual lede reads:

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has said Israel is escalating military measures and would freeze peace efforts after a Tel Aviv suicide bombing unless Palestinians smashed militant groups.

Meaning that Sharon is threatening to restart military operations if, after an undisclosed amount of time, Abbas doesn't take action against terrorists (read: "please say you're going to do something so we don't have to act").

The Dean Collapse Explained

DNC pollsters are still scratching their heads about the youth demographic from the last election. Meanwhile, Sony's been hip to what's going on all along:

Demonstrating a deep understanding of what its computer-gaming audience, Sony has built the ability to order pizza into its latest online multiplayer game. Type the command "/pizza" while playing Everquest II, a fantasy game with 330,000 active players, and get the Pizza Hut Web site, where you can place orders for delivery.

They'll be rocking the vote in no time.

Poor Long Term Planning

Who in Damascus is in charge of making sure that covert missions and assassinations serve the national interest? They're fired:

Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz said on Saturday that Syria was to blame for a suicide bombing that killed four Israelis was carried out by a militant from the Damascus-based Islamic Jihad group.
"Syria continues to give amnesty to terror groups and encourages them to carry out attacks, which endangers the (peace) process with the Palestinians and the stability in the region," a Defense Ministry spokesman quoted Mofaz as saying.

By "endangers... stability in the region" he means "because when we get around to justifiably retaliating, that's going to make things unstable".

Another European Anti-Semitism Post

I get the sense that the "not funny jokes" to "petulant news posts about European anti-Semitism" ratio has been increasing lately (for the non-math folks, that means more not funny jokes and the same number of petulant news posts). Luckily, there's a way to combine them:

European Union justice and interior ministers on Thursday shelved proposals to ban the use of Nazi symbols after failing to agree on how such a ban could help fight racism and anti-Semitism... On the table was a proposal by Luxembourg Justice Minister Luc Frieden that rules combating racism should include a ban "on displaying symbols inciting hatred and violence" like the Nazis' use of the swastika.

Their real concern: "how are we going to make our 'Star of David equals Swastika' posters if you ban swastikas?"

Because You Come Here for Hard News

Some posts write themselves:

Sexy starlet Jenna Elfman has gotten so deeply into Scientology that her main goal these days is to help it take over the world... Scientology "is a complete understanding of what is happening on the planet right now"... Elfman says you must devote yourself to Scientology or "you could be dead."

In the strictest logical sense, of course, she's right. It does seem that among the choices one could make, both devoting oneself to Scientology and being dead are options. But what about neither being dead or a Scientologist? Can I choose that one:

Scientologists who reach "OT 3" are told about "Xenu," a galactic ruler who paralyzed humans and sent them back to Earth in spaceships 75 million years ago, reports CultNews.com, which closely follows the faith. They were then arranged around a volcano and murdered with H-bombs, but their souls are still hanging around and are known as "Body Thetans" or "BTs."

It could be the case that no one religion has all of the answers. But certainly we can all come together on the idea that this one is way off, no?

Wow That Totally Misses The Point

Today's bombing underscores need to discuss the Gaza withdrawal in the context of what it will do to Israel's deterrent - so it's fortunate that the Jerusalem Post has provided an editorial demonstrating precisely how not to have the discussion:

Let's be honest, though. Despite all that, there's no way to prevent the Palestinians from viewing the disengagement as a victory. You can just bet this summer we'll be seeing plenty of news reports of Palestinians gleefully celebrating as they stream through the gates of the abandoned Gaza settlements.
But that by itself won't mean leaving Gaza is the wrong decision. Hizbullah fighters also preened for the cameras five years ago with abandoned Israeli equipment in the Lebanon security zone. Pessimists predicted then that the Iranian-backed Islamic militia, emboldened by its "success," would continue to fire missiles and commit even more terrorist incursions across the border. It hasn't happened...
But the Lebanon withdrawal now appears to have set in motion deeper political currents that bode ill for all of the country's extremist elements, and their Syrian and Iranian backers, while holding the promise of a better future for both the majority of Lebanese and their neighbors to the south.

Let's ignore for a moment that the only reason Syria overreached is not because of Israel's withdrawal but because of the invasion of Iraq. But even ignoring the classic post hoc fallacy, this so-called contribution breath-takingly misses the point of the deterrence debate. It's not so much that the withdrawal strengthened Hizbullah - although it did, and they now have literally tens of thousands of rockets aimed at Israeli population centers, ready for an all-out war and disruption of Israel's back lines. Rather, the withdrawal made Israel look weak to other enemies. It is now overwhelmingly conceded that Arafat thought that he could achieve more by violence than by negotiations precisely because the way Israel withdrew from Lebanon made it look weak.
But I still think that disengagement is a demographic necessity. The problem then is how to minimize the deterrence hit that Israel will take. An easy step would be to totally demolish the settlements. This would deny Al Jezeera the ability to beam pictures of "conquered Jewish property" across the Muslim world. Israel took an enormous diplomatic hit (and an almost full break with the US under the Bush I administration - thank you Jim Baker) to build them up. There's no reason they should now take an enormous military hit by not breaking them down.

And Again

At times like this, it's easy to lose sight of larger trends and insist that the Shin Bet needs to spend less time focusing on right-wing Jewish incitement and more time worrying about fanatical Islamic murderers:

An explosion took place on the Herbert Samuel street promenade at around 11:30 p.m. near the Sage night club in Tel Aviv, Israel Radio reported. According to some reports there are 30 injured, while all the injured have been evacuated to hospitals in the Tel Aviv area. Magen David Adom reported that 23 injured, three in critical condition, 11 in serious condition, and the rest lightly injured have been evacuated to Tel Aviv hospitals.
According to a police statement, the cause of the blast was likely due to a suicide bomber.

The Shin Bet should spend less time focusing on right-wing Jewish incitement and more time worrying about fanatical Islamic murderers. I can't help but wonder if the bomber was a prisoner that Israel released to show confidence in Abbas's ability to crack down on terrorists.
Sharon won't retaliate for this, and now disengagement will take place under the shadow of terror. It will look like Israel is being forced out of Gaza, repeating the Lebanon-like evisceration of Israel's deterrent.. What Sharon should do is roll into Gaza, wipe out Hamas, and then continue with disengagement. Screw Abbas's credibility.

UPDATE: Yedioth Ahronoth is reporting that the following groups have all denied responsibility: Islamic Jihad, Hizbullah, and Hamas - and moreso, that the PA is accepting their denials. Meanwhile, there's this sick sick society tidbit:

Members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and Islamic Jihad fired in the air in celebration on hearing of the terror attack in Tel Aviv. Both organization claimed responsibility for the attack despite denials by senior members of the organization (Ali Waked)

Who's lying? Was this the work of a rogue cell - reports claim that other bombers were seen fleeing from the scene.

ANOTHER UPDATE:The PA is gearing up to claim that this was the act of an individual - by which I presume they mean a splinter cell.

Too Easy

MEMRI's doing the decoding of odious Islamism so you don't have to:

In light of the criticism recently leveled against Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, the Doha Youth Center held a solidarity conference on February 17, 2005... Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi noted that... "I hope my life will end with a virtuous death, like [the death] sought by warriors fighting Jihad for the sake of Allah... I am not afraid of the Mossad or the Americans." He also said: "The Mossad has threatened to eliminate me, and I hope that Allah will grant me martyrdom [ shahada ] for His sake and that my life will end by my dying at the hands of the enemies of Islam."

How much of the Mossad's time do you think is really spent planning complex assassination plots of lunatic mullahs in countries other than Iran? It can't really be that much. But even the hollowest nut still wants to be cracked - literally, I suppose. And if the Mossad was to want to come after him, surely his powerful patrons would protect him:

London Mayor Ken Livingstone appeared [in a film played at the conference]... Livingstone noted that after special committees had studied Al-Qaradhawi's ideology by reviewing over 140 books, as well as sermons and lectures by Al-Qaradhawi, it was found that "Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi's ideology is utterly remote from extremism."

Utterly remote.

The Red Line is Somewhere Behind You

How to start a civil war, courtesy of Chabadniks disobeying Chabad:

Under the banner, "Arik Sharon, you are bringing upon us a Holocaust," and with pictures of the Lubavitcher Rebbe everywhere, thousands of demonstrators gathered Thursday night at the Jerusalem International Convention Center to protest the evacuation of settlements in the Gaza Strip and northern Samaria...
Leaflets that were handed out during the convention stated that in each settlement there are "more weapons, ammunition and skilled individuals than during the Warsaw ghetto uprising"...
Last week, the Chabad Rabbinical Council, Chabad's mainstream leadership, called on Chabadniks not to take part in the demonstration.

I'm sensitive to the argument that accusing anti-disengagement protesters of incitement is a way to stifle legitimate political dissent (which is why Tzipi Livni's proposal to create "a new unit to handle illegal protest activity against the disengagement plan" is genuinely disturbing). But the risk of stifling dissent certainly can't justify letting genuine incitement go unchecked. I don't know where the line is exactly, but contextualizing disengagement as a battle akin to preventing the liquidation of the Warsaw Ghetto is way, way over it.

Nice Jewish Girls Gone Wild


In our religion-inspired gossip news category, how could an Israeli-born actress studying at Hebrew University think this could possibly be a good idea:

Natalie Portman... The Oscar-nominated star was chased off her Jerusalem set by a large group of Orthodox Jews who were enraged when she and actor Aki Avni kissed near Judaism's holiest site... Portman and Avni were performing the supposedly salacious act in a parking lot near the Western Wall.
"Whores! Whores!" chanted dozens of Orthodox Jewish men, the paper reported. The cast and crew packed up abruptly and fled.

Which is totally unfair - she's not a whore. She's a very nice girl.

Next Up: Eating Babies

Could they get more evil:

A teenage girl and two young men in Iran have been sentenced to lashes for having sex. The court dismissed the girl's claim that we was raped... The girl was sentenced to 100 lashes... The young men in the case were sentenced to 30 and 40 lashes each.

I'm sure that the DNA swab and physical evidence that the mullahs no doubt examined before dismissing the girl's claims were carefully examined and prepared by a professional rape counselor. But ignore for a second this stomach-turning case study in blaming the victim: the mullahs concluded that the sex was consensual and THEN sentenced the girl to 100 lashes. Because 75 lashes just wouldn't have done the trick apparently (although 30 lashes - that'll teach the rapists!) The rest of the article helpfully provides some context:

Under Iranian law, girls over the age of nine and boys over 16 face the death penalty for crimes such as rape and murder, while capital punishment can be imposed in certain cases of illegal sexual relationships.

First of all, and this is neither here nor there, but "the death penalty" and "capital punishment" mean the same thing. So the lesson here is, if you're a 9 year old Iranian girl who's been raped, don't try to get out of your 100 lashes by saying that it was consensual - otherwise they'll kill you. What was it like to be in the meeting where that law was made: "my fellow mullahs, our threats of beheading have persuaded all men 16 and above not to hold women's hands in public. But there is a plague of 9 and 10 year old girls who are still seducing older men. This is unacceptable, and those girls must be punished!"

And They're So Articulate!

AP takes today's prize for dumbest. headline. ever.

Palestinians Pick Highly Educated Cabinet: 24-Member Palestinian Cabinet Made Up of Doctors, Lawyers, Engineers and Economists

Great. That should get them a lot of cred with the 19 year old thugs who own the Palestinian street. But I guess this headline is better than "Palestinians Pick Highly Educated Cabinet, hope to stop killing Israelis long enough to get country", which would at least have the benifit of being true. This article is over the top about the new Cabinet ("revolution"?!?):

The Cabinet revolution, spurred by lawmakers' demand for a clean sweep of the political hacks associated with Arafat's corruption-plagued regime, signaled the decade-old Palestinian Authority is ready for a new era.

And how was the AP treating those political hacks when they were in power? Sycophants. Not that they should get credit for catching up with the rest of the world and discovering that the previous Palestinian cabinet was filled with thugs and cronies: they're just doing it so that they can criticize Israel for not surrendering fast enough to the new one.

Stop. Breath. Calm Down. Gooood.

Someone really, really needs to get out more. From AccuWeather:

Ladies and gentlemen, would you look at this. The perfect setup for a big winter storm. It is not often that the atmosphere develops this look, so you can imagine all the excitement that has existed in the AccuWeather.com forecasting center today. What will happen is that two branches of the jet stream will merge late in the weekend, a signature of all great storms.

You really have to click through and see the picture. It's priceless. Anyway, whoever this is continues:

This allows cold air from the north to come in direct contact with mild, moist air to the south, and the result is often explosive storm development... the storms are likely to merge over the Northeast forming one giant circulation.

Cold air merging with moist air from below resulting in an explosion. If only Wonkette did stories on the weather.

UPDATE: Turns out AccuWeather is based in State College, PA. Figures.

I Knew That Duct Tape Thing Was a Scam

Forget the Cheney/Haliburton conspiracy theories. The Democratic Underground nutcases have been missing the boat:

Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge will join the board of Home Depot Inc., replacing Roger Penske, the company said Thursday.

Somebody Didn't Read the Talking Points

Just saw David Baker speak about the Israeli-Palestinian situation. David Baker is great because, among other things, he's an Israeli spokesperson who actually speaks English - which makes him a beautiful, rare thing that must be cherished.
At one point he was talking about why the press paints the Palestinians as miserable and the Israelis as evil oppressors: it's easier to take a picture of a tank rumbling through a refugee camp than to evaluate the grinding psychological pain of not knowing if your 16 year old is going to make it home on a bus every day (he apparently didn't my usual explanation - "because their stringers are terrorist sympathizers who hate Jews"). And he's going on and on, and at one point uses the phrase "security wall," which of course is a strict no-no (mostly because it's really just not a wall, but also because the word "wall" has negative connotations). I assume there was a memo about this.
Then he corrected himself, called it a fence, and pointed out that 95% of the barrier really is a fence. But of course, since we're on a college campus, there were at least 5 or 6 psuedo-academics who "feel really really powerfully" about the "plight of the Palestinians". And those 5 or 6, stayed mostly quiet through the talk - except the one guy who basically accused AIPAC of controlling US foreign policy and caused all the assembled dignitaries to shuffle their feet uncomfortably. But when Baker corrected himself, they openly smirked and embarressed everyone again.
Of course, they got theirs when Swanee Hunt said "I didn't support the Iraq War" but "every time we get an Iraqi woman behind a microphone, they say 'Thank You America!'" I haven't seen a room full of academics that despondent since TV Nation got canceled.

Israel Can Trust the International Community

It's impossible to underestimate how little the average international intellectual cares about Jewish lives:

A controversial film about two Palestinian suicide bombers, Paradise Now, won a major prize at the 55th Berlin Film Festival on Saturday... a correspondent for the Austrian Jewish newspaper Die J dische was harshly critical of the film, especially the decision by Abu Assad not to show the victims of a suicide bombing that takes place at the film's end, as the screen fades to white just before the blast takes place.
"Throughout the movie, Israelis are invisible; you can only see them from afar, only as figures, not as human beings," wrote Tobias Ebbrecht. "You are not allowed to get to know any of them, neither the civilian at the bus station, the soldiers in the bus, the little girl next to the bus driver, for otherwise the audience could empathize with them.

This quotidian, caustic kind of anti-Semitism - barely expressed as concern with the "Palestinian plight" - flows under the surface of international sensibility, erupting alternatively as violence against Jews on European streets and action against Israel in the United Nations General Assembly.

Arabs Misbehave, Jews Get Punished

What's the best way to make the region more secure and teach Iran that nuclear saber-rattling doesn't pay? Force its mortal enemy to disarm:

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy published its fifth report last Friday... The report's authors recommend that Israel examine a proposal to cease the production of fissionable materials used for the development of nuclear weapons, on the assumption that all the other states in the region will do the same...
[I]t is a mistake to demand that Israel pay the price for an Iranian retreat from its military nuclear project, and in this way divert some of the international pressure on Iran to Israel as well.

The problems with forcing Israel to open up its nuclear facilities to international inspectors are too numerous to list. Suffice to say that the IAEA's inspection regime has the last group of human beings on the planet who don't believe Iran wants nukes, but they're more than willing to criticize Israel. But that's to be expected, given that it's a UN agency the personal of which reflect UN demographics.
The other major problem - at the risk of sounding too much like an ideologue - is that Israel struggles to exist within the international rule of law. When they sign treaties, they keep their obligations - which is why North Korea has no problem signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty and then cheating, but Israel stays out of the NPT because they know that they'd have to cheat if they signed on. So, just as Israel stays out of the International Criminal Court because they know that they'd be subjected to politicized prosecutions, so must they stay out of the NPT because they'd be subjected to politicized inspections.

Barak Insults His Betters

New definition of chutzpa in 5, 4, 3...:

Barak said that "the Sharon family is corrupt to the core." In any developed country, he said, Sharon would be dismissed from his position following the accumulation of affairs connected to him and his family.

He also criticized the Labor party for not fighting against Sharon's concessions to the Palestinians. This is Ehud Barak, criticizing a Prime Minister for campaign finance irregularities and caving into Palestinian demands. It's good to see he's regained his political instincts. And Barak should have the decency to get out of the way of peacemakers willing to stand on their principles:

"Jerusalem will remain united as the eternal capital of the Jewish people. It will not be divided," Prime Minister Ariel Sharon pledged on Monday at the conclusion of a meeting with President Moshe Katsav.

That's more than Barak was willing to do. Much, much more.

Trust Ha'aretz to Give Away the Houses

Of course:

There is also the possibility under discussion to demolish the buildings right after they are evacuated to prevent radical rightists from taking over the structures and refusing to leave. If the Palestinians don't want the houses, let them demolish them. The Israeli security forces should devote their efforts to foiling any attempt by disengagement opponents to occupy the abandoned properties. It would be a very serious mistake by the government to leave behind scorched earth. The image of an Israeli bulldozer on the rubble of a house does not fit in well with the thousands of words being said about aspirations for turning the historic withdrawal into a lever to rehabilitate the trust between Israel and the Palestinians.

The image of Hamas radicals dancing and raising the Palestinian flag over the homes from which have just been ethnically cleansed of Jews does not fit in well with the idea that Israel is in control of the disengagement. And making Palestinians believe that they've defeated Israel through violence would be a disaster.

UPDATE: Damnit!

The Limits of Dissent

Lynn B has been closely following (see also: this post) the debate about when and where the Israeli Right crossed the limits of legitimate dissent into open incitement. Not that she'd agree with the way I'm framing that debate: her belief, and she's at least partly in good company, is that the specter of incitement is being mobilized to shut down legitimate dissent. And the Sharon government is clearly engaging in some heavy-handed stifling of dissent:

The police force will deploy 4,000 officers around the Gaza Strip ahead of the planned evacuation to prevent anti-pullout activists from entering the settlements and disrupting the withdrawal.

But it's also important to remember not only that a sitting Prime Minister has been murdered for trying to make peace, but also that there are still very public, very powerful figures willing to risk a similar tragedy

Mazuz is demanding that the Supreme Court overrule Justice Yaakov Tirkel's 1997 ruling that Feiglin's convictions, including both verbal and published calls for rebellion, are not crimes of moral turpitude.
According to Mazuz, "a High Court ruling is necessary in light of today's volatile reality, inflammatory (remarks) in the public arena, which are expected to become even fiercer, and the negative impact that could come of leaving this decision unchanged, from the standpoint of the problematic public message that it conveys."

Not Credible

The "Does Dean Love Terrorists or Just Hate Israel" issue is back with his election as DNC Chair. For those of you who don't remember Dean's tragicomedic flailings during the primary season:

[Dean] alienated some pro-Israel Democrats when he said he would pursue an "evenhanded approach" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict... Asked if he would oppose the Israeli policy of selectively killing leaders of Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups, Dean referred to members of Hamas as "soldiers" in the Israeli-Palestinian "war," but then gave a lukewarm endorsement of the practice.

In fairness, I think that Dean was just ignorant about Israel. Odds are, he really just didn't realize that "even-handed" is a euphemism in Middle Eastern politics for moral equivalence and anti-Israel agitation. That said, the ideological community that he emerges from - the confused, politics-as-personal therapy Nation/MoveOn fog - is unable to come to grips with the dynamics of the Arab war against the Jewish state (one of the reasons that he was so out of touch is because things that seem reasonable in that community are way, way out of line for anyone who believes in Israeli self-defense).
The degree to which the magazines that Dean has been reading every day of his political life have permanently inclined him to anti-Israel bias is an open question. But even if he did understand the dynamics of the conflict, all of Dean's sensibilities - his discomfort with ever using force, his belief that rational discussion can cure irrational hatred, and his aversion to any approach advocated by the Bush White House - disable him from being an effective protector of Israeli interests. Absurdly, the best defense that pro-Dean Democrats could come up with is literally a symptom of all of these problems:

DNC Vice Chair Susan Turnbull, speaking on behalf of the DNC, said, "Howard Dean has a strong record, as does the Democratic Party, of working to support peace in the Middle East."..."The negative propaganda won't stick," she added.

That strong record is called "Oslo."

The Devil is in the Details

Why is it that the American public has such a hard time getting accurate descriptions of the situation on the ground in the Middle East? ABCNews's headline on Sharon's historic, heart-rending decision to release Palestinian criminals and terrorists is "Palestinians Welcome 500 Free Prisoners, Demand Israel Release Uprising Leaders". Let's examine this closely. By "Uprising Leaders" they mean "terrorists with blood on their hands." And what are they going to do if the murderers aren't sprung out of jail:

Hamas militants appeared unmasked in a West Bank city, their leader shouting that there can be no peace "as long as there is a single prisoner in Israeli jails."

If they really believe that there can be no peace, appearing without masks was probably more of a bad idea than a good idea.

Is It Safe To Come Out Yet?

At least you can be sure that he's being honest:

Israel Air Force Commander-in-Chief Major General Eliezer Shakedi said Monday that Israel must be prepared for an air strike on Iran in light of its nuclear activity... Shakedi wouldn't say whether he thought Israel was capable of carrying out such a mission alone... Shakedi said. "I hope that there won't be a war - but you know, no one knows."

Is he really giving a passive-aggressive press conference? "I'm not saying you *have* to go to your grandmother's house... I just don't know what will happen if you don't."

Sharon's Gamble

This remains the essence of the disengagement plan:

The main fly in this ointment of super-political rationality is that while Arik's Israel is now totally committed to the physical evacuation of settlements by July, the solidity of Washington's commitment to its part of the deal - support for Israeli annexation of the major settlement blocs on the West Bank, through the thick and thin of negotiations on a long-term settlement with Abu Mazen's Palestinian Authority - is far from certain.

It will take a political master to keep everything together - one false step, and the slippery slope of withdrawal will become an international feeding frenzy for territorial concessions which will end up obliterating Israel's strategic depth (this is in fact what happened to Netanyahu at Wye). Sharon is a tactical genius, and the best Israeli politician alive. He has the closest ties to an American President ever, and the American President that he has ties to happens to be on an on-going mission to remake the world. Maybe giving Sharon some room to maneuver wouldn't be the worst idea.

Humor Link of the Day

Ha. Ha. Ha:

The Arab League chief said Monday that Syria will "soon" take steps to withdraw its army from Lebanese areas in accordance with a 1989 agreement.

Sigh.

Religion of Sexual Servitude

Primatives:

A tribal council in Pakistan has ordered the betrothal of a 2-year-old girl to a man 40 years older to punish her uncle for an alleged affair with the man's wife... The council decreed the girl must marry 42-year-old Mohammed Altaf, her uncle's cousin, when she turns 18, police said.

Truly understanding the primitive tribalism of these petty morality bullies is a mind-numbing and thoroughly depressing exercise. The entire episode is something out of an over-eager Ayn Rand hatchet job: a woman bound to a life of sexual servitude because the religious gang that controls her village has taken exception to something a member of her family did with someone else from her village. Perhaps this is the time to consider that there might be something to liberal Western values after all.

Search Terms of the Day II

From Yahoo Search, "Jews Eat Babies". Whoever you are, you should know that you are not welcome. Also, that we've recently switched from babies to Taco Bell. Who says Judaism isn't an evolving religion?

Search Terms of the Day

From MSN Search, we had a visitor searching on The official web site of the french embassy in Riyadh. Whoever you are, you should know that the French embassy in Riyadh can be contacted at PO Box 94367, Riyadh 11693 or by telephone at +966-01-488-12-55. The website is only in French (no English translation for you, brute!), but you still get a sense of cowardice and mendacity just by looking at the pictures.

Excuse Me While I Geek Out

Best. Idea. Ever.

Where are Those Stupid T-Shirts Now?

Now that Lebanese are (this is so typical) calling for an Intifada against Syria, do you think that petulant, dull-eyed college hippies will start sporting asinine t-shirts to show everyone how brave they are? Or will the lack of underlying anti-Semitism make "showing solidarity" with an occupied population less fun?

No No No

Seriously, where do they get off making demands:

Sa'id Siam, a Hamas leader in the Strip, said at a protest that if all prisoners aren't released, a cease-fire will not be considered.

Well if he's not interested in a cease-fire, I'm sure that the IDF (currently being muzzled by Mofaz) will know how to deal with it. How about Israel releases the prisoners it wants to, Siam keeps his mouth shut, and in return he gets to stay alive?

Words Are Funny Things

What the hell is wrong with Putin:

Russian President Vladimir Putin said here today that recent steps taken by Iran have convinced Russia it was not planning to build nuclear weapons.

By "recent steps" he means "really facile lies".

Hey UN, Shove It

It's great when the UN self-righteously preaches to Israel:

John Dugard, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in the territories, told the Knesset Law Committee that the army has destroyed 4,170 Palestinian homes since September 2000...
Dugard focused on the army's demolition of houses carried out on grounds of alleged "military necessity." He said these demolitions constituted 85 percent of all Palestinian house demolitions, and violated the Fourth Geneva Convention, because the homes had not been destroyed during combat.

Israel often points out that delicate, cocktail party attending UN dilettantes who snidely talk about "Apartheid Walls" have no business making one-sided military pronouncements. For some reason, there's always an unending supply of over-refined of "humanitarians" ready to carp at Israel.
Dugard usually superciliously skirts criticisms like this by noting that it's beyond his mandate to criticize Palestinians - he is techincally the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in the Palestinian territories, so his job is limited entirely to criticizing Israel for self-defense. His defense of his biased, one-sided criticism of Israel is that the United Nations pays him to be biased and one-sided. Great.

Syria Carries Water for Iran

Iran has specialized knowledge in three areas: (1) being theocratic fascists, (2) building nuclear weapons, and (3) how to handle international hatred. It's nice they're willing to share:

Iran and Syria, who both are facing pressure from the United States, said Wednesday they will form a "united front" to confront possible threats against them, state-run television reported. "In view of the special conditions faced by Syria, Iran will transfer its experience, especially concerning sanctions, to Syria,"

Syria is expected to contribute knowledge based on their extensive experience with maintaining a Third World economy and dealing with starving populations.

Turning Over a New Leaf Watch

No sooner do I post something hopeful about Abbas, the Holocaust Denier goes and does something like this:

In the first decision of its kind since he succeeded Yasser Arafat, Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas has ratified death sentences against three Palestinians found guilty of "collaboration" with Israel...
However, senior PA officials told The Jerusalem Post that the three were Gaza Strip residents who had been convicted of "high treason" for tipping off Israeli security forces about the whereabouts of wanted gunmen.

Shouldn't Abbas want Palestinians to help Israelis find wanted gunmen (read: Hamas terrorists) especially since his power is ostensibly being threatened by those very gunmen? He must want to keep them around for some reason.

UPDATE: Lynn B points out the hypocrisy angle of this story.

Good Job Guys!

Remember that Simpsons episode where Lisa frees the dolphin king and dooms the human race?. Follow closely: CNN reports that some geek with womb envy is teaching robots how to learn and walk like a toddler, "improving its step and balance with every stride" (with every stride - great!). It's a good thing that robots are learning to walk, because they're going to need to move quickly in order to be the kind of super-effective killing machines that the US army is training them to be. So at least they're taking care of that. And finally, seriously, how can this ever be a good idea:

Kim Jong-hwan, the director of the ITRC-Intelligent Robot Research Centre, has developed a series of artificial chromosomes that he says will allow robots to feel lust and could eventually lead to them reproducing. He says the software, which will be installed in a robot within the next three months, will give the machines the ability to feel, reason and desire.

No way this can go badly.

How Should a Conservative Feel About Disengagement?

The Jerusalem Post has a long, must-read on shifting trans-Atlantic political alliances as Sharon pushes the disengagement plan:

In Bush, both Israeli and American conservatives believed the US had found a president who not only recognized this threat, but who was willing to put his money where his mouth was... he unapologetically surrounded himself with what his attackers called the "neoconservative cabal"... and simultaneously befriended Sharon... [he] deepened the natural three-way alliance between Washington, Jerusalem and the conservatives, who finally felt their ideas were being adopted by the leaders of both countries...
It might have been expected, then, that American conservative intellectuals would oppose Sharon's plan, just as they had opposed Oslo. And in fact, some, like Frank Gaffney... and... Daniel Pipes, have argued strongly against it. But most others, including Podhoretz, his wife, Midge Decter... Charles Krauthammer... [and] William Kristol, are behind Sharon. As a result, Commentary and the Weekly Standard, which published numerous pieces against the Oslo Accords, have been relatively quiet over the disengagement plan.

At the risk of sounding too much like a stereotypical, resentful, self-important Israeli Leftist (because that "Leftist" thing is totally untrue), I think that this time it is the case that there can be a geniune peace process between Israel and the Palestinians - and that some American conservative opponents are letting ideological purity get in the way of Israeli prosperity. The difference between disengagement and Oslo is that, throughout Oslo, opponents were screaming at the top of their lungs that Arafat was still engaging in incitement and preparing for war. Now Pipes's main point is that although Abbas is clamping down on incitement and violence (not just violence), he's doing it for the wrong reasons. But it's not enough to say that Abbas is doing the right things for the wrong reasons - opponents of cooperation have to be able to explain why bad motives matter. I don't care particularly if Abbas is closing down TV stations and rounding up Hamas because he likes Israel or rather because he thinks that violence is tactically unproductive - as long as he's doing it and is going to keep doing it.
Now of course, the crucial question is whether or not he is indeed going to continue cooperating with Israel. Or is he going to be like Arafat, where a temporary drop in violence was merely used to regroup? That's an open question, and it's a question that should be debated.
On one hand, you have the Pipes argument that Abbas is not genuine - so there's always the risk that, if the balance of power tips his way, he'll launch a terrorist war. What Pipes leaves out is the idea that Arafat was only able to do that beacause he had spent the last half a decade inciting the Palestinian population against Israel - the Palestinian street was ready to explode, and he lit the match. But if Abbas shuts down incitement and the Palestinian territories prosper, then even if he wants to launch another terrorist war, he won't have the available terrorists.
This entire theory, of course, relies on the idea that Abbas genuinely goes after terrorists and shuts down incitement - that he gives Palestinians a chance to prosper. Those of us that do support disengagement (and I tentatively do as the only alternative to an untenable demographic situation) owe it to those of us on the other side to stay honest and admit when it seems like Abbas isn't a real peace partner.

Syria - What a Bunch of Idiots

Headline: Bush Says Syria 'Out of Step' With Mideast Progress...
... seeks to reintroduce step with large bomb.
I've been woefully behind on this whole "Western educated moderate" (thanks State Dept!) Bashar Assad killing the opposition story. Turns out you can burn Israeli and American flags in Beirut, but suggesting that the country that is actually occupying Lebanon might be a little off-tilt is a strict no-no.
But whether you're up on the story or not, one thing you can be sure of - the Jews did it:

Syria's main regional ally Iran expressed concern about the fallout of what it condemned as a "terrorist act" - and cast suspicion on Israel.
"An organised terrorist structure such as the Zionist regime has the capacity for such an operation whose aim is to undermine the unity of Lebanon," foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency.

Meanwhile, the family of the slain Prime Minister is demanding an international investigation. I'm sure that the UN will get right on that (while I'm on the subject, how's that whole "stabilizing the country" thing going for the UN Peacekeeping Operation there?) I do like how the Guardian covers the Middle East though:

The intense international pressure to find his killers has increased anxieties in Lebanon and its neighboring powerbroker, Syria, which has announced it is seeking stronger cooperation with Iran.

How come I never see the Guardian referring to Israel as the West Bank's "neighboring powerbroker"? Syria has more troops in Lebanon than Israel has in Tel Aviv, every week the Lebanese Prime Minister has to shuffle over to Damuscus with promises to obey the Syrians, and Syria kills political opponents (not like Israel kills Palestinian "political activists" - the ones Syria kills don't bow up school busses). But according to the British media, Syria is an anti-colonialist bulwark and Israel is an apartheid state that Blair needs to force into massive territorial concessions. Good to see that Britain has worked out that whole anti-Semitism problem they were wrestling with.

Seriously, I Think They Hate Love

The Onion, as if reading Mere Rhetoric, is much amused by Islamist hatred of all things affectionate:

A new videotape of Osama bin Laden broadcast on the Arab satellite news channel Al-Jazeera Monday beseeched Allah to grant all Americans a "crappy Valentine's Day."

One problem. Not funny any more:

Saudi Arabia's morality police are on the scent of illicit red roses as part of a clampdown on would-be St Valentine's lovers in the strict Muslim kingdom... Florists say the move is part of an annual campaign by the committee - whose members are known as "mutawwaeen" or volunteers - to prevent Saudis marking a festival they believe flouts their austere doctrine of "Wahhabi" Islam.

Again, I don't want to slip into hyperbole - but they're genuinely afraid that emotions will disrupt the numbing, grinding routine of mindless ritual necessary to keep the entire population yoked to the chain of fanatical Islam.

What's Wrong With American Judaism?

Uber-philanthropist Michael Steinhardt has done more than most people on the planet to keep American Judaism strong. And he's more than a little despondent

The crisis is expressed not only in rates of intermarriage, which seem to hover around 50 percent, but in our population statistics, which are at best stagnant and more probably reflective of a decline. American Jews are marrying later and having fewer children relative to previous Jewish generations and to their non-Jewish counterparts.
But the crisis is not limited to demography. In the area of Jewish literacy, popular films such as Garden State, which take for granted the remoteness of temple attendance for contemporary Jews, only scratch the surface of the malaise. A silent majority of non-Orthodox Jews are well on their way to Jewish disappearance. They have no representation in our communal structures; nor does the community occupy itself with the challenge of preventing their slipping away.

The article is by super-philanthropist Michael Steinhardt, and it's worth reading the whole thing. He makes a single critical, and often overlooked, point:

American Jews have yet to understand that victimization is an insufficient basis for identity. Even in an era of increased openness and tolerance, the American Jewish community believes that community cohesion depends on external threats and bogeymen.

American Judaism has fallen for the same maliase that has afflicted other minority groups in America: ongoing participation in unseemly, race-to-the-bottom claims for victim badges. Tracing how we got to this point would be a non-trivial task: 1960s Jewish activists who took their sensibilities with them into Jewish leadership, political discourse about minorities that only makes sense in particular ways, and cross-pollination with other identity groups all contribute to these strategies. But there's also a more banal dynamic: Jewish student leaders are trained in the same way that other leaders of minority groups are trained, and that's still locked in the tired model of 1960s based student activism. Showing solidarity, writing petitions, and protesting are all part and parcel of this model. The problem is that all of those acts - the performance of which literally is student activism - are fundamentally reactionary. They are reactive to some percieved slight rather than proactive celebrations of identity. And the kind of petulant resentment that they're built around can never sustain a political strategy.
His solution - revitalizing Jewish communities by emphasizing Jewish values - doesn't go far enough to solve the suffocating fog that is young Jews' apathy towards their heritage. In fact, "day schools, camps, youth movements and Hillel, and Israel travel and study" are the status quo. From the moment they can be shipped off to Hebrew school, American Jewish children are provided with an almost limitless number of ways to be "connected" to Judaism. And yet somehow prepackaged life cycles, canned trips to Israel, and lessons on counting in Hebrew have all failed to ignite a commitment to Judaism. In the meantime, Islam and Christianity is growing throughout the United States. College and high school students shout their devotions in gigantic stadiums.
These stadiums are filled with devotees because their religious leaders tell their followers that they have the truth - and moreso, that accepting the truth and living according to it is a task only the strongest and bravest can live up to. Of course the young flock to that kind of message. Christian evangelicals, for instance, tell young Christians that their religion is true, that Christians are blessed, and that the rest of the world is wrong. In response, young Jews are told that they can believe whatever they want and that the sum total of their religious obligation involves bringing some canned goods from home around the High Holidays.
This argument is not about Orthodox vs. Reform or religious vs. secular. A few years ago, I was privileged to see one of the most prominent Reform rabbis in Pittsburgh just absolutely shred his congregation for pulling their children out of Hebrew school to go trick-or-treating. The basis of his sermon - and this is so simple and so crucial - was simply that Jewish values are superior to secular values. He strongly reminded those assembled that Jews must fulfill Jewish commitments first and follow Jewish values primarily. These are the kinds of words that get people riled up. These are the kinds of demands that people respond to. These are the kinds of words that are necessary to carry Judaism to the next generation.
Youth are the lifeblood of any culture, and so the crisis revolving around young Jewish identity is of staggering consequence. Assimilation is skyrocketing, anti-Semitism is sweeping the globe, and the Jewish State itself is in existential danger. Here we face neither the prospect of victory nor of defeat - neither the Six Day War nor Massada. What American Judaism faces is destruction by a quiet shrug of disinterest, while we all drown in the bags and bags of the chocolate coins that threaten to become the totality of Jewish lived experience.

Like Old Times

There's something reassuring about a world in which Syria responds to an Israeli military ass-whipping by purchasing arms from Russia:

Diplomatic sources said Israel Air Force F-16 multi-role fighters intercepted and downed two Syrian MiG-29 fighter-jets last year... Diplomatic sources said the Syrian losses led President Bashar Assad to accelerate efforts to procure advanced anti-aircraft systems from Russia.

During the Cold War, Israel used to aim its nuclear missiles at Moscow so that the Russians would know who would be punished if the Arabs overran Israel with Soviet arms. Not the worst idea.

Ha'aretz: Free the Murderers!

Is anyone surprised that Ha'aretz has a near-hysterical article in favor of a massive and over-reaching prisoner release?

There is something about the release of prisoners that benefits those who release them as well. Guarding the walls of crowded prisons creates a feeling that we have some kind of neutralized bomb in our hands, that we have the keys to future quiet in our hands, even though this quiet is not attained. Opening the gates can make it clear to Israelis, once and for all, that there is a connection between Palestinian happiness and Israeli peace and quiet.

I don't even know what that means. But trust Ha'aretz to take a difficult diplomatic problem, reach beyond what any reasonable person can accept, and then preach sanctimoniously about how Israelis need to see things from the Palestinian point of view. Which apparently involves something about killing Jews because you're "frustrated and disallusioned."

Hey France, Shove It

If they weren't so anti-Semitic, I'd call it Chutzpa:

The French government has demanded that Israel provide information on companies selling arms to the Ivory Coast, where a civil war is now raging. The demand, which indirectly places responsibility on Israeli companies for the death of French soldiers on a peace-keeping mission, was apparently raised by the French Embassy's military attache...
The French say the soldiers were killed when drones and surveillance systems assisted the Ivory Coast air force in attacking a base where they were stationed. The Ivory Coast government said the attack had been directed at rebel forces. In a reprisal, however, the French air force destroyed the Ivory Coast aircraft, hit the drones and destroyed the intelligence center operated by the Israeli systems.

First of all, where does France get off criticized anyone for selling weapons to rogue regimes? These are the people who stood in the way of liberating Iraq so that they could keep their arms sales and oil gluttony from the public eye. French arms killed American soldiers in Iraq.
Second, how insane is it that France could be so pompous as to demand a formal "explanation" from Israel for supplying weapons before any war ever started to a country that would then face a neo-imperialist onslaught from a petulant middle power. I know that this issue has been discussed on the blogosphere at length, but it's important to emphasize French hypocrisy because sometimes it's so surreal as to be unbelievable.

Saudi Men Like Islamic Fundamentalism, Positions of Privilege

The BBC seems genuinely surprised:

Islamist-backed candidates have taken a commanding lead in Saudi Arabia's first municipal election, in Riyadh. The poll is part of an official plan to bring elements of democracy to the Gulf kingdom.

Of course, it's easy to make fun of this "election" since, ya know, only 400,000 people in the country are actually allowed to vote. But this election presents a pointed case of a much larger problem: if the Bush administration's plan is to use democracy in order to modernize the Arab world (first comes "voting" and only afterwards are they supposed to get to "don't drop houses on gay people for being gay"), what's going to happen if they choose to vote themselves into the 7th century? Are we going to stop them - and if so, how are we going to sell that move either domestically or abroad? After Occupied Japan voted in a government that was too close to the old Emperor, MacArthur anulled the election and told the Japanese public to try again. We need to be willing to do the same in the Middle East.

That Famed British Charm

Societies with systemic and violent Jew-hatred do not just emerge out of nowhere. There are always lunatics and thugs. The kind of intellectualized, New anti-Semitism that's been sweeping Europe is conveyed by the snide, defensively self-righteous comments of sophisticates and the revelatory outbursts of public figures. So it is in Britain:

[London Mayor] Ken Livingstone was accused last night of having "lost the plot" after an angry confrontation with a Jewish journalist who, he said, was behaving "just like a concentration camp guard"... His "concentration camp" remark came after being told that the reporter was Jewish, it was claimed.

Anti-Semitic slurs do not remain in the circles of society's upper-crust. There is a direct relationship between a culture where civic leaders legitimize anti-Semitism and less nuanced expressions that occur downstream:

Violent anti-Semitic attacks in Britain have reached "alarming" record levels... The Community Security Trust (CST)... said on Thursday there had been 532 "anti-Semitic incidents"... in 2004, including a record 83 assaults. The total, which included abuse and threats, was a rise of 42 percent from the CST's 2003 figure, and well above the previous record high of 405 in 2000.

Get A Hold of Yourselves

This is bad on so many levels:

Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu... [was met by] a group of disengagement-plan opponents verbally assaulted him. The attackers, who are not residents of the ultra-Orthodox community, approached the minister... and shouted slogans against Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to evacuate Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip and the northern West Bank. The assailants... tried to assault him.

I can't understand why these people keep losing public support. The disengagement-plan opponents have several good points, not the least of which involve the problems inherent in evicting Jews from their homes. But let's not mince words: to try to physically assault a sitting minister makes them no better than any of the other enemies of the state who, given the chance, would do the same. Political violence is a bright line - one crosses it only at the risk of full public delegitimization.

Did They Or Didn't They?

The LA Times is so confusing sometimes. Their headline is ambiguous:

President of the Palestinian Authority acts after Hamas said its fighters had launched dozens of mortar rounds and crude Kassam rockets at Gaza settlements.

Do you know why "Hamas said" that they launched mortar rounds at Israelis? Uhh... because they did. Meanwhile, Sharon is willing to give Abbas more time, if only to demonstrate that there are Palestinians who really just want to kill Jews. Because the world isn't convinced yet [ed - Seriously, the Holocaust denier seems legit - 25 security officers sacked immediately Yeah, but who wants optimism?]

Islamic Radicals Launch Assault on Affection

It pretty much had to happen:

Indonesia's government is considering a law banning unwed couples from pecking in public and harshly penalizing those who do... The campaign against kissing is part of a proposal of sweeping reforms to laws adopted by the country's Dutch colonial rulers in the late 19th century.
The head of the panel that drafted the law said Muslim beliefs about decency had influenced its decision. Neighboring countries with large Muslim populations, such as Malaysia and Brunei, already enforce laws defining "khalwat," or "close proximity," a crime akin to adultery for unchaperoned meetings between Muslim men and women.

Yeah, those evil European colonialists who had the nerve to want men and women to like each other. I wonder if this will come up during the next pretentious lecture that I have to sit through about the oppression of the Other's unique and wondrous culture.
I don't want to sound overbearing, but these eye-rolling excesses should call attention to the true agenda of radical Islam: it is an ideology devoted to removing from everyday life mirth, flirtation, entertainment, joking, and ultimately joy. The Islamo-facists would replace the light gestures and soft moments that make life worth living with the harshness of mindless obedience to the Koran. Like all fascists, they don't care about hearts and minds - quite the opposite, they prefer their populations docile and unfeeling - they want them numb and hopeless.

Thanks For Nothing

Now that the Israelis are going above and beyond what they should be expected to do in the near term, it's nice to know that the Jordanians and Egyptians are willing to fulfill their treaty obligations:

Jordan and Egypt announced they were sending their ambassadors back to Israel, because, as the Jordanian foreign minister told reporters, "they will now have plenty of work to do on the political process."

Someone should let the Jordanian foreign minister know that it's not the job of an ambassador to interfere with the domestic affairs of their host countries. In fact, someone should let him know that ambassadors get fired for doing work on political processes. Only in the surreal world of international diplomacy, where slapping Israel around humiliatingly is how you demonstrate that you're part of the crowd, could this stunt even be suggested.

Yeah OK

Historic change blah blah blah determination to see an end to violence blah blah partners in the peace of the brave blah blah blah:

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas pledged publicly in Sharm e-Sheikh Tuesday to put an end to four years of violence, and in a private meeting, expressed their determination to make these declarations stick this time.

This part's my favorite:

Abbas... stated in Arabic: "We have agreed... on and end to all acts of violence against Palestinians and Israelis, wherever they are."

The entire Palestinian population is with him in his historic decision to stop killing Jews:

Hamas and Islamic Jihad on Tuesday rejected Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's pledge at the Sharm e-Sheikh summit to end years of bloodshed..."The talk about what the leader of the Palestinian Authority called a cessation of acts of violence is not binding on the resistance because this is a unilateral stand and was not the outcome of an intra-Palestinian dialogue as has been agreed previously," Osama Hamdan, the Hamas representative in Lebanon, told The Associated Press.

There's a post to be written about why Hamas has official representatives in Lebanon that are buddy buddy with AP, but that's not this post. This post is about how Palestinians are still determined to kill Jews. But I'm being unfair. Everyone agrees that it's going to be impossible to get the die-hard terrorists to accept a Jewish presence in the Middle East. All we can really hope for is that Abbas will commit the Palestinian Authority, as he promised, to preventing the various Palestinian terrorist groups from attacking Israelis:

In an attempt to calm Hamas, PA Foreign Minister Nabil Shaath denied that the PA had agreed to disarm armed militias. "We didn't talk about disarming the infrastructure of the groups and an intra-Palestinian war," Shaath told al-Jazeera shortly after the Sharm e-Sheikh summit ended.

Sharon is spilling his heart and making historic and unprecedented statements...

Addressing "our Palestinian neighbors," Sharon made clear that Israel has given up its dream of Greater Eretz Yisrael. "I assure you that we have a genuine intention to respect your right to live independently and in dignity," he said. "I have already said that Israel has no desire to continue to govern over you and control your fate. We in Israel have had to awaken from our dreams, painfully"

... and in response the Palestinians are refusing even to disarm terrorists. Let me be clear: the dream of a permanent Jewish presence in large parts of the West Bank and in almost all of the Gaza Strip is unrealistic. It's bad for the local Arab populations and it's arguably worse for the Jews who live there. But it's ironic that Sharon would come to Sharm e-Sheikh - a city that he first visited when he took it over in 1956 - to give away land. How many times do the Arabs get to try to push the Jews into the sea without suffering any consequences? How many times will Israel pull it's head out of the noose, only to be immediately forced to walk back up to the gallows?

Tell Me Again About How Democrats Can Be Trusted

It's nice that the Palestinians are at least pretending to recognize Israel this time:

Israeli flags flew inside a cluster of Jordanian, Egyptian and Palestinian flags on the route from the Sharm e-Sheikh airport to the resort hotel where the four-way summit was being held Tuesday morning, already a marked improvement from the last time Israeli and Palestinian leaders met here in 2000... Then, Prime Minister Ehud Barak's entourage returned from the previous summit feeling humiliated. In addition to the flag incident, Barak's cell-phone was taken from him before he went into the main hall for the declarations.

Joking aside, this formal recognition of the Israeli state is a heartening sign. But farbeit from me to miss an opportunity to be negative: the last time Israel came to make massive territorial concessions at Shram e-Sheikh, there wasn't even a hint that the Palestinians had given up their dream of destroying the Jewish state. Quite the opposite - the Israelis were openly humiliated, treated as supplicants begging for peace. And nonetheless, the United States foreign policy elite that clings to Democratic administrations pushed Barak (who pushed the Knesset) into committing to massive, binding concessions. Arafat had the nerve to reject even all of Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. Rice pressuring Israel is uncomfortable and kind of ugly, but she's still miles away from the humiliation that the Clinton-Gore team heaped on Netanyahu and Barak.

Ungrateful Bastards

They can just do this now?

The Palestinians yesterday rejected an Israeli offer to release 900 prisoners as a gesture to Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, calling the proposal "insulting."

What's insulting is that the Palestinians think that they can start a war, murder Israeli civilians for half a decade, humiliatingly lose, and still set terms for peace. What's even more insulting is that Europe and the United States are helping them:

The crisis over the prisoner releases was largely predictable, since this is an ideal time for the Palestinians to demand additional Israeli concessions: U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice arrives Sunday, and a four-way summit between Sharon, Abbas, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and King Abdullah of Jordan is scheduled for Tuesday. Both Rice and the summit participants are expected to press Israel on its gestures.

Caroline Glick is just brutal on this question this morning:

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice gave form to the Palestinian state... "The Israelis," she said, "were going to have to recognize that there was going to have to be land for - contiguous land for the Palestinian state to exist on." Contiguous land? Well, how can there be contiguity between the West Bank on the east and the Gaza Strip on the west unless Israel is split in two?... And now we know where America stands on the issue... Since the so-called road map is the only plan in town, we already know that America has joined Europe, the UN, and radical left wing Israelis

In fact, go read the whole Glick article.

Thanks, But We're Busy That Weekend

Egypt is being so helpful:

Egypt offers to mediate in Israeli-Syrian peace talks... Egypt seeks to convey to Syria the benefits of resuming negotiations with Israel, chief among them reducing American pressure on Damascus over its reported role in allowing militants to destabilize neighboring Iraq.

Seriously, screw Syria. There must be some other, less annoying way for Egypt to try to destroy Israel this week, right?

Charming

Sometimes, you hear grumbling out of Jerusalem that there are certain branches of the US Federal Government which seem to have a history of institutionalized anti-Semitism. Then you see eye-rolling mingled with petulant insistences that "criticizing Israel isn't anti-Semitic". After all, how could an institutional culture of deep-seated anti-Semitism ever emerge:

Five of Adolph Eichmann's Nazi assistants were recruited and employed by the Central Intelligence Agency after World War II... The newly-revealed documents are based on internal investigations in the CIA's history department. The agency has steadfastly refused to make the documents public for fear they would cause embarassment.

Institutional bias and direction are delicate things, based on years of quotidian interactions and hallway discussions between superiors and subordinates, colleagues and friends. I imagine that these sub-humans were treated as honored members of the intelligence community (if only to hide their true histories), and it's difficult to imagine that their perversions did not seep into the minds and practices of younger generations.

Turning Over a New Leaf Watch

Israel: Here's a peace overture in the form of a massive prisoner release.
Palestinians: Eh, how about some child suicide bombers instead?