What the hell is going on over at Ha'aretz this morning? Every single editorial and news story is defeatist in the most transparent and least credible way. Usually I'm at least a little bit exaggerating, but this is
absurd - to use their own language, "its hard to believe that this isn't being coordinated." I'll just go into the opinion pieces – dissecting the news stories is kind of beside the point – there are only so many ways you can point out that stacking 15 Meretz quotes next to 2 Likud quotes is bias. Mind you, I'm not cherry-picking here - I'm literally going straight down their front-page:
Reminders of Lebanon: The Gaza attack could be a catalyst for opposition to remaining in the Strip, and is likely to accelerate a pullout. Notice the weasel wording - "could be a catalyst" - ok, a butterfly flapping its wings
could be a catalyst - suddenly goes to "likely to accelerate" - well actually, no, not so much. Hoping for an Israeli humiliation and defeat just so you can get Sharon out of office is unbecoming, but at least they should try to make a reasonable case. The logic here rises about to the level of "Stalin had a dog, you have a dog, you're Stalin". "Six or seven people dying and Arabs getting their bodies in Lebanon caused Israel to leave, so six or seven people dying in Gaza and Arabs getting their bodies in Gaza will cause Israel to leave." This ignores are all the salient and essential differences - the fact that Gaza is in the context of an Intifada, which changes all the rules; the fact that Hamas clearly has no limited goals while there was at least the claim that Hezbollah did; the fact that Israelis are disgusted with the parading of human body parts and want them back now; the fact that Israel actually has access to where the bodies are being kept and can go and get them. But that's not as much fun as making asinine analogies.
Israel's damage control: Sharon and Mofaz tried to isolate the Gaza incident, describing it as a tragedy but not as an event of strategic significance. "But we know better" the opinion piece smirks. The main point of this article: Sharon and Mofaz are too scared to retaliate heavily in Gaza, because it will make them look like tools for supporting disengagement. Not only do I suspect
that's false, not only does everything that Sharon and Mofaz are saying indicate that
that's false, but I'm pretty confident that the next couple of days will demonstrate
just how false that is.
This article also had such gems as:
Defense officials said yesterday that "the world" would not look kindly on a major Israeli operation in Gaza. The IDF presented Sharon with a series of limited operations aimed at improving Israel's position against the terror organizations in Gaza.
I don't think its really any of the world's business at this point. Also, what the hell are defense people doing giving diplomatic advice? And since when? And how bad does that advise have to be when even Ma'ariv is pointing out that
Europe is ignoring Gaza because, among other things, they don't know what the think about the situation of their darling Palestinians acting like barbaric animals. Also, the public relations campaign that Shalom is launching will help with some of that. I mean, this is so brutally obvious not even the Israeli Foreign Ministry can screw this up: parading heads through city streets.
It was decided, for now, to refuse to negotiate with the organizations holding the body parts. It's not clear how long Israel will stick to this position, especially when it is under pressure from the families of the soldiers.
Technically true in a weasel kind of way - but really
false.
Anything that's decided is technically decided "for now" even if its also decided "for later." So when Mofaz says that we won't negotiate with the terrorists ever, that also means "for now." Which is the only think that keeps this article from being a string of out-right lies.
Incidentally, the headline of the actual article is "Analysis / Israel's main goal: Damage control" - I'm pretty sure Israel's main goal is getting the bodies back, and I'm not sure what's gained by implying otherwise. I mean, if you're going to be a sniveling little bastard, at least put "Sharon's Main Goal" or "Government's Main Goal" or "Politicians' Main Goal." Putting "Israel's Main Goal" can only be designed to be callous and cynical. Ha'aretz is just outrageous this morning.
Inspiring the Militants: The devastating attack on an APC restored Hamas and Islamic Jihad's lost prestige after Israel's assassination of Sheikh Yassin and Rantisi. It turns out that contrary to what you might think, Ha'aretz didn't actually mean this headline as a mission statement (who knew? with celebratory phrases like "devastating attack" and "the attack by Hamas and the Islamic Jihad in concert", it reads like a Hamas victory leaflet. All that's missing is "our glorious brothers", and really, the news cycle is still young).
I mean, listen, yes - Hamas looks damn good in the Gaza street right now. I'm going to get into exactly what that says about the Gaza street. But to say that murdering a family and killing 6 soldiers makes up for the strategic imbalance of obliterating their leadership hierarchy sounds - well, it sounds like Ha'aretz is trying to convince the Israeli public (and the Palestinian public), despite all evidence, that Israel is losing to Hamas. The only reason there are so many celebrations in Gaza right now is because they've got body parts to carry around - great, but proving yourself to be primitive savages (because animals don't celebrate their kills) is not the stuff that military victories are made of.
And this part just doesn't pass the laugh test:
The killing of the Hatuel family and the blowing up of an IDF armored personnel carrier... Even moderates and Arab countries like Egypt and Jordan will find it difficult to condemn these attacks as they do with suicide bombings.
If Egypt and Jordan can't find it in their hearts to condemn filming yourself gleefully while shooting a 2 year old, her pregnant mother, and her 3 sisters in the head... If Egypt and Jordan can't find it in their hearts to condemn filming yourself carrying the severed head of a human being through the streets while crowds cheer... Well, to put it in the mildest terms, only someone on the Ha'aretz editorial staff would think that that's actually a poor reflection on Israel.
A Victory for Hamas: More of Ha'aretz doing its damnedest to explain in as much effusive detail exactly how great Hamas is looking right now. There's a nice cataloging of exactly which Hamas operations were super-sweet and which just "contributed greatly to [the] goal" of defeating Israel. You can look it up if you're interested, but there's not much new there.
The defense minister's responsibility: This one just kind of impressed me with the level of duplicity it was able to muster. It is an article that at times gleefully and at times mournfully (but mostly with ill-disguised gleeful faux-mourning) calls for Mofaz's resignation (of course, because its Amir Oren, there's also a call for Sharon to be indicted... it could be an article about wine prices in the Golan and Amir Oren would find a way to talk about the Greek Island Affair). Anyway, so the article really, really gets a kick out of calling for Mofaz's resignation. Fair enough - I could go into the usual litany of resentment and schadenfreude. But I don't have to, because the article's first paragraph literally is:
Editorial pieces and the covers of weeklies in the West in recent days are resonating with either a scathing demand, malicious joy or a melancholy pleading: Rumsfeld, resign.
Wow.
And this just in from the entire editorial staff at Ha'aretz:
GAZA IS QUAGMIRE. That was quick too - talk about being on message!
The current picture on Ha'aretz's front-page is of an injured Palestinian civilian being taken into a hospital. I guess there are no other pictures that might describe the situation in Gaza available.
I understand that the implications of yesterday's atrocities are still being figured out. My concern is that it seems that every single writer at Ha'aretz - every single one - has already figured them out, and that they've figured them out wrong. This isn't a reasonable accounting of the facts - this is open glee at what they perceive to be a political defeat for Sharon instead of a brave rallying in the face of what is actually a human tragedy for Israel.