Obama: We're Giving Iran More Time Because Of Their "Unsettled Political Situation"

At least now we know what unblinking pretexts Obama's getting from his Iran advisers. They need to explain why all their nuanced Tehranology - which always ends with some new inscrutable justification for pro-Iran gestures - has merely emboldened Khamenei into confidently coming out as a hardline thug. It can't be that liberal foreign policy experts have spent the last few decades disingenuously denying that the Iranian political echelon is controlled by apocalyptic hardliners.
It's not that they produced paper after paper in the 90's predicting - incorrectly - that "moderates" would be electorally empowered if Albright made apologies and Clinton offered back channel concessions. It's not that they spent the Bush years howling - untenably - that offering a Grand Bargain would enable "conservative pragmatists" to "get Khamenei's ear." And it's certainly not that they made up tales - suspiciously - of Iranian wiggle room on nukes while lunatics were being installed as negotiators.
Sure it all looks exactly that way. And sure a genuinely nuanced analysis of Iranian ideology explains why it looks that way, since Khamenei's commitment to pan-Islamism would stymie state-level negotiations even if he wasn't the ultra-hardliner that he is.
But what you don't understand is that there are all these factions. And they're fighting with one another. And - even though it might appear like one side keeps winning, indicating either that there's no internal struggle or that it doesn't matter - you need to ignore that in the same way you ignore decades of failed diplomatic outreach. Just a few more weeks of sophistication and all this carefully calibrated groveling will yield a modus vivendi. You'll see!
U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday an unsettled political situation in Iran may be complicating efforts to seal a nuclear fuel deal between Tehran and major world powers... "But it is going to take time, and part of the challenge that we face is that neither North Korea nor Iran seem to be settled enough politically to make quick decisions on these issues," he told Reuters in an interview at the White House.
Which is weird, because it certainly looks like the regime came to a quick decision. Here's how the talks have been going post-Qom, pegged either to the dateline or - where the lede was explicit - to when specific statements were made:
Mon Oct 19: "... Iran had signaled going into the meeting that it would not meet Western demands for a deal..."
Tues Oct 20: "... nuclear technology program to go ahead..."
Wed Oct 21: "Stalled talks."
Thurs Oct 22: "Senior Iran MP casts doubt on atom fuel deal"
That was the first week. Then Iran said they needed a week to think things over, and the IAEA promptly jumped into action, intoning that Iran is "considering the proposal in depth and in a favorable light, but needs until the middle of next week to provide a response." There wasn't technically any evidence of that "favorable light" - words like "doubt" and "stalled" are usually interpreted the opposite way - but the IAEA was already pot-committed to helping Iran get to the nuclear finish line. The Iranians came back after the weekend and...
Tues Oct 27: "... a move that could unravel the plan ..."
Thur 29: "Iran appears to dash quick deal hopes"
Sat Oct 31: "Ahmadinejad likened the power of Iran's enemies to a mosquito... 'the Iranian government... looks at the talks with no trust.'"
Fast forward another week and...
Fri Nov 6: "Tehran Will Reject UN-Backed Nuclear Deal"
Sat Nov 7: "Senior Iranian lawmakers rejected... any possibility of Tehran shipping uranium abroad... intensifying pressures on the government to reject the U.N.-backed plan altogether."
Sun Nov 8: "Iran Said to Ignore Effort to Salvage Nuclear Deal"
Then Obama made that statement about all the oh-so-complicated politiking that must be going on behind closed doors - because why else would his keen diplomacy be failing - and the was sentiment duly echoed by our diplomats in Europe. That way everyone could be on the same page, just in case the Iranians changed their minds! Which they still might. You never know.
For instance there was this one day where this one Minister said Iran was willing to string the West along some more, and he wouldn't have said that unless there was a real chance for a deal. Obviously.
References:
* Khamenei Seizes Control Of Iranian Republican Guard Militias, Installs Son As Head Thug [MR]
* "Unprecedented" Power Grab By Iranian Ultra-Hardliners Casts Doubt On "Pragmatists Are Winning" Liberal Sophistication [MR]
* Super! Iran's New Nuclear Negotiator Dedicated To Bringing About The End Of The World. Yes, Really. [MR]
* Obama says difficult for Iran to make quick decisions [Reuters]
* Diplomats: 1st day of Iran nuke talks inconclusive [AP]
* Clenched In A Post-Geneva Promise To Keep Developing Nukes [Is Iran's Fist Still Clenched?]
* Clenched With Another Round Of "Stalled Talks," Of Course [Is Iran's Fist Still Clenched?]
* Senior Iran MP casts doubt on atom fuel deal [YNet]
* Report: Iran says will reply to IAEA proposal next week [YNet]
* IAEA says Iran needs more time to review nuke deal [AP]
* Iran wants big changes to nuclear deal with powers [Reuters]
* Iran appears to dash quick deal hopes [JPost]
* Ahmadinejad: Iran in position of power in nuclear talks [Ha'aretz]
* Iran Lawmakers Say Tehran Will Reject UN-Backed Nuclear Deal [VOA]
* Iran lawmakers: No shipment of uranium abroad [AP]
* Iran Said to Ignore Effort to Salvage Nuclear Deal [NYT]
* U.S. says can give Iran time to okay nuclear deal [Reuters]
* Iran says UN-backed nuclear deal is not dead [AP]
Related Mere Rhetoric Categories:
* Foreign Policy Experts
* Diplomacy Coverage
* Iran Coverage








