Taliban-Era Photos Prove That Brutal Islamist Repression Of Sexuality Not So Successful, Kind Of Surreal

In 2001 Mullah Omar's bodyguard explained the macabre delight that the Taliban took in creatively torturing Afghanis who tried to extract even the smallest pleasures from life:
Basically any form of pleasure was outlawed," Mr Hassani said, "and if we found people doing any of these things we would beat them with staves soaked in water - like a knife cutting through meat - until the room ran with their blood or their spines snapped. Then we would leave them with no food or water in rooms filled with insects until they died. We always tried to do different things: we would put some of them standing on their heads to sleep, hang others upside down with their legs tied together. We would stretch the arms out of others and nail them to posts like crucifixions. Sometimes we would throw bread to them to make them crawl. Then I would write the report to our commanding officer so he could see how innovative we had been.
Repressing human sexuality is pretty much the definition of an impossible totalitarian project. The more brutal the repression, the more it guarantees symptomatic and sometimes pathological outbursts. Sometimes the rebellions happen as surreptitiously and normally as possible - Iran's gay and straight underground clubs are probably good examples of this. But other times the repression is so severe that sexuality gets expressed in only the angriest and most brutal ways - ergo the epidemics of homosexual and heterosexual rape during the Muslim-led anti-Soviet war. And in between, you get expressions of sexuality that go from the stubborn to the surreal.

After the jump - where these photos came from, how they got published, and the European left's oh-so-predictable reaction.

Thomas Dworzak found these Taliban-era pictures lying around in photo stores after the liberation of Afghanistan. There's a whole slideshow of these things, complete with descriptions of some of the more pathological Taliban campaigns. You can also buy the whole 128 page book through Amazon. There are descriptions of the usual stuff - beheading ancient statues and not letting women get passport photos. But there were also some really bizarre obsessions. Going from shop to shop chopping the heads off mannequins? Defacing traffic signs because they have outlines of animals? Obviously not healthy.
Also: is there anything cuter than politically correct liberals confronted with the consequences of insipid international multiculturalism?
A lot of people thought that it was my way of representing the Taliban... that [I] made them look like... gay icons. They chose to do it themselves. So I got a lot of criticism in Europe from the sort of liberal PC left who found it demeaning for me to make them look like this. They choose to look like that.
Of course that would be the criticism. Not that sharia law was so suffocating that it triggered weird outbursts of hyper feminine sexuality from hysterically masculine Taliban fighters. Nope. It's that demonstrating the sometimes surreal effects of Islamist repression is demeaning. Naturally.
References:
* Taliban (Hardcover) by Jon Lee Anderson (Author), Thomas Dworzak (Editor) [Amazon]
* I was one of the Taliban's torturers: I crucified people [Telegraph]
* Taliban by Thomas Dworzak [Slideshow]
Previously:
* Hamas Leaders Less Enthusiastic About Martyrdom As Israeli Crackdown Intensifies
* Hey Gals, Check This Out - Pathological Islamism in Germany
* UC Irvine Muslims Can't Decide Between Seething Resentment and Fantasies Of Global Conquest [Video]








