We have a paper due and t we have to supervise an exam, so don't be expecting much in the way of reasoned analysis today (more just incoherent venting). That said, can this possibly be true:

None of the Israeli papers picked up on this as far as we know, and we didn't hear about it until this morning. If it's true, then it brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "intentionally trying to screw Israel". We're not going to explain - yet again - why even the premise of the right of return is a complete travesty in every sense of the word. Suffice to say that the right of return means the end of Israel as a Jewish state. If the Baker Panel genuinely endorsed it, then obviously the panel is recommending that the President adopt a foreign policy of actively undermining Israel's national security. We're not looking to exaggerate, but let's not mince words either: endorsing a policy that recommends that three million of the most rabidly anti-Semitic people on the planet flood into Israel is literally endorsing an invasion of Israel by its enemies.

Previously: Times UK Celebrates Saudi Peace Initiative - Now Without Peeking, Do You Think It's Good Or Bad For Israel?, Ahmadinejad Still Threatening To Nuke Israel, UN Still Not Caring, http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11272970.html