Losing In Iraq Seems Like A Bad Idea
We don't have time this week to really do anything approaching "analysis", but by the time we get back it'll be too late to post this article from early this week. Mark Steyn on the stakes in Iraq:
As it is, we're in a very dark place right now. It has been a long time since America unambiguously won a war, and to choose to lose Iraq would be an act of such parochial self-indulgence that the American moment would not endure, and would not deserve to. Europe is becoming semi-Muslim, Third World basket-case states are going nuclear, and, for all that 40 percent of planetary military spending, America can't muster the will to take on pipsqueak enemies. We think we can just call off the game early, and go back home and watch TV.
It doesn't work like that. Whatever it started out as, Iraq is a test of American seriousness. And, if the Great Satan can't win in Vietnam or Iraq, where can it win? That's how China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Venezuela and a whole lot of others look at it. "These Colors Don't Run" is a fine T-shirt slogan, but in reality these colors have spent 40 years running from the jungles of Southeast Asia, the helicopters in the Persian desert, the streets of Mogadishu. ... To add the sands of Mesopotamia to the list will be an act of weakness from which America will never recover.
Also read the Belmont Club's more extensive roundup of how losing in Iraq is going to be understood by the rest of the world.
Previously: AP Headline and Lede: Syrian War Against Israel Would Be "Resistance", Democrats Partying Like It's 2004, Insulting the Sacrifice Of Coalition of the Willing, Iraq Recognizing Israel - Not So Much





