Evidence of Massive Zionist Control of Canadian Public Opinion
Vital Perspective posts a poll from saying that 38 percent of Quebecers and 31 percent of all Canadians think that Israel's actions in the Middle East were a "primary cause" of 9/11. This just goes to show how insidious the Zionist controlled media is. Look at the false choice they've managed to force on naive Canadians: either Israel's "actions in the Middle East" caused 9/11 or Israel didn't cause 9/11. FALSE CHOICE! We all know that 9/11 was caused by Israel's actions... in New York - where Israeli agents filmed as Israeli military planes crashed into the Twin Towers, which had been emptied of Jews (or as New Jersey poet laureate Amiri Baraka asked, "who told 4,000 Israeli workers at the Twin Towers / To stay home that day"... but we're all in on the nudge-nudge wink-wink: he just said Israelis so he could say that people were trying to stifle his legitimate criticism of Israel when they pointed out that he obviously meant Jews since the popular rumor was always that 4,000 Jews stayed home and there were never 4,000 Israelis working in the Towers anyway... awesome tactic, incidentally). Anyway, conclusive proof that Zionists control Canadian polling, trying to distract people from the obvious reality that Israel brought down the Towers to advance the Likud agenda.
You know why this sarcasm is really, really sad? Because the idea that Israeli actions in the Middle East were primarily responsible for 9/11 is a conclusion you arrive at for rational reasons:
(1) AQ repeatedly declared that the US presence in Saudi Arabia was primarily responsible for 9/11
(2) Even Arafat pointed out that AQ was openly and bitterly disdainful of Palestinians for decades until the group needed an international cause celebre after 9/11
Now we've been told (and told and told and told) that if someone is saying something bad about Israel then it is never OK to accuse them of anti-Semitism, since that is stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. We've kind of given up that ghost. But how about a compromise: they promise not to insult us by pretending that they have rational causes for scapegoating Israel, and we promise not to link their irrational scapegoating of Israel to anti-Semitism. We'll just let the actual cause hang in the air without mentioning it - like when fanatics attack a US embassy and Reuters says the attackers shouted "religious slogans" but fails to identify the religion. We'll just say that these people have an "irrational hatred of Israel" but we won't mention what it actually is.
Seems fair.
You know why this sarcasm is really, really sad? Because the idea that Israeli actions in the Middle East were primarily responsible for 9/11 is a conclusion you arrive at for rational reasons:
(1) AQ repeatedly declared that the US presence in Saudi Arabia was primarily responsible for 9/11
(2) Even Arafat pointed out that AQ was openly and bitterly disdainful of Palestinians for decades until the group needed an international cause celebre after 9/11
Now we've been told (and told and told and told) that if someone is saying something bad about Israel then it is never OK to accuse them of anti-Semitism, since that is stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. We've kind of given up that ghost. But how about a compromise: they promise not to insult us by pretending that they have rational causes for scapegoating Israel, and we promise not to link their irrational scapegoating of Israel to anti-Semitism. We'll just let the actual cause hang in the air without mentioning it - like when fanatics attack a US embassy and Reuters says the attackers shouted "religious slogans" but fails to identify the religion. We'll just say that these people have an "irrational hatred of Israel" but we won't mention what it actually is.
Seems fair.





