Islamists: Jews Not Good Enough to Be Lied To
Sometimes, in highly detailed arguments at the margins of various debates, we lose sight of the big picture:
As America rushes to conclude what they call the Peace Process with the help of the traitors who rule our lands, there is a bid from within the Muslims to assist the grand betrayal of giving most of Palestine to the Jews!...
Would it have been possible that the best Ummah sent to mankind had not destroyed Israel long ago if we had a sincere Islamic leadership which unleashed the armed forces of the Muslim world against Israel to remove it from the face of this earth? Would this leadership have been begging for peace and 20% of Palestine knowing the Jews are cowardly and cursed, killers of prophets who Allah (swt) turned into monkeys and pigs unlike the current traitors who control our lands?
Sure, sure. Pigs, monkeys, traitors. Blah blah. But one of the really charming parts of this rant is where the guy (and trust us, it's a guy) says that Jews are too low even to be lied to:
As for those who justify peace with Israel using the Agreement of Hudaybiah, this is a malicious fabrication as there is no comparison. Hudaybiah did not concern occupied Muslim land but was a temporary ceasefire between 2 states. The Messenger did not surrender any Muslim land to the kuffar at Hudaybiah or any other time while the peace process requires permanently surrendering 80% of Palestine to the Jews.
The Agreement of Hudaybiah was a peace treaty that Muhammad signed with the Quraysh tribe, who at the time controlled Mecca. Long story short, Muhammad used the time to build up his army, waiting until the right time to broke the peace and conquer Mecca - which he did starting in 629. Now, it's not-so-covert code for making a peace treaty that one has no intention of keeping, just to gain better strategic or military ground in preparation for ultimately breaking it. Not coincidentally, this is exactly what Arafat did:
No less damaging than his comments about Jerusalem was Arafat's cryptic allusion about his agreement with Israel. Criticized by Arabs and Muslims for having made concessions to Israel, he defended his actions by comparing them to those of the Prophet Muhammad in a similar circumstance:
I see this agreement as being no more than the agreement signed between our Prophet Muhammad and the Quraysh in Mecca.
But even lying to Jews when you're weak so you can destroy them later when you're strong is too much talking for our Islamist friend here.
(Via: LGF)
As America rushes to conclude what they call the Peace Process with the help of the traitors who rule our lands, there is a bid from within the Muslims to assist the grand betrayal of giving most of Palestine to the Jews!...
Would it have been possible that the best Ummah sent to mankind had not destroyed Israel long ago if we had a sincere Islamic leadership which unleashed the armed forces of the Muslim world against Israel to remove it from the face of this earth? Would this leadership have been begging for peace and 20% of Palestine knowing the Jews are cowardly and cursed, killers of prophets who Allah (swt) turned into monkeys and pigs unlike the current traitors who control our lands?
Sure, sure. Pigs, monkeys, traitors. Blah blah. But one of the really charming parts of this rant is where the guy (and trust us, it's a guy) says that Jews are too low even to be lied to:
As for those who justify peace with Israel using the Agreement of Hudaybiah, this is a malicious fabrication as there is no comparison. Hudaybiah did not concern occupied Muslim land but was a temporary ceasefire between 2 states. The Messenger did not surrender any Muslim land to the kuffar at Hudaybiah or any other time while the peace process requires permanently surrendering 80% of Palestine to the Jews.
The Agreement of Hudaybiah was a peace treaty that Muhammad signed with the Quraysh tribe, who at the time controlled Mecca. Long story short, Muhammad used the time to build up his army, waiting until the right time to broke the peace and conquer Mecca - which he did starting in 629. Now, it's not-so-covert code for making a peace treaty that one has no intention of keeping, just to gain better strategic or military ground in preparation for ultimately breaking it. Not coincidentally, this is exactly what Arafat did:
No less damaging than his comments about Jerusalem was Arafat's cryptic allusion about his agreement with Israel. Criticized by Arabs and Muslims for having made concessions to Israel, he defended his actions by comparing them to those of the Prophet Muhammad in a similar circumstance:
I see this agreement as being no more than the agreement signed between our Prophet Muhammad and the Quraysh in Mecca.
But even lying to Jews when you're weak so you can destroy them later when you're strong is too much talking for our Islamist friend here.
(Via: LGF)
