Islamic Jihad Admits Suicide Bombing Was To Unify Palestinians. It Has No Connection To Fictional “Zionist Crimes” That Press Will Make Up.

By
Omri Ceren
– January 29, 2007Posted in: Islamic Terrorism, Palestinians

Could there be a more disgusting:

The Islamic Jihad organization said Monday that the suicide bombing that killed three people in an Eilat bakery, the first such attack in the southern resort town, was meant to help bring an end to weeks of Hamas-Fatah infighting.

We’ve always said that the Palestinians will never go to civil war because every time they get to the brink, they’ll be reminded that it’s the Jews that they really want to kill. And everyone kind of knows that that’s what can really bring Palestinian society together. But it’s disgusting to actually hear it being said out in the open – for terrorist groups that Europe fawns over to declare that Jewish lives are so meaningless that they can be destroyed just to remind Palestinians that they’re all one big, happy, genocidal family.

Which of course won’t stop the press from carrying Hamas’s statement that this was in response to unnamed (but simply assumed) Zionist crimes:

But a spokesman for Hamas praised the bombing as a natural response to Israeli military policies in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, as well as its ongoing boycott of the Hamas-led Palestinian government – a position likely to complicate the group’s current efforts to end a crippling aid boycott imposed by the international community.

Hamas thinks that Jews are filthy Occupiers that should be pushed into the Sea. But if Israel says “well, if you don’t like us then we’re not going to have anything to do with you” then Hamas… declares that they’re going to push the Jews into the Sea. They’re well-armed, genocidal, petulant children – and the world caters to them as something in between legitimate statesmen and lambs being led to slaughter.

Previously: Updates About That Other Group of Genocidal Lunatics Currently Shooting, Bombing Israelis, Like Hezbollah, Hamas Uses Children As Human Shields, Treating Genocidal Fanatics Like Statesmen Is A Bad Idea (When Did This Become Controversial?)

Related Mere Rhetoric Posts: