From the most recent American Prospect (January’s – sorry there’s no link, I got this off lexis. Emphasis mine):
In early November, the Pentagon civilians ordered the U.S. military in Iraq to launch a heavily armed offensive against suspected strongholds of the resistance, using fighter bombers, laser-guided missiles, gunships and helicopters against targets of questionable importance, such as empty factories and warehouses. “It’s an absolutely insane strategy,” says Bob Boorstin, who oversees national-security policy for the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank.
And as if on cue, from this morning’s Washington Post (note even the way that targeting those “empty factories and warehouses” has forced insurgents into the middle of the city):
Fearful that their conversations might be intercepted, resistance leaders are now reluctant to communicate by telephone or radio and rely instead on passing messages by word of mouth, often depending on younger members of the five inner-circle families, military officers said. But U.S. troops now monitor anyone leaving the village.
They acknowledge, however, that resistance leaders may still be operating from other safe houses in the area, in particular in Abu Ajeel, Qadassiyah, Dawr and downtown Tikrit, where the inner-circle families maintain second homes and farms.
Update: Prof. Dauber has a “nothing succeeds like Israeli military tactics” take on the whole thing.
Related Mere Rhetoric Posts:




